Lawstaff is opening…
One operational home for the work around your practice. Start with the bottleneck hurting your firm today; add staff as your operation grows.
Every call and chat answered, day and night. Screened, routed, scheduled.
Qualification, conflict screening, and retainer prep — surfaced for your determination and sign-off by morning.
Drafts, records requests, and deadline tracking in your templates and voice.
Real case law via CourtListener — controlling authority with verifiable citations.
Every matter tracked, every client updated, every stale file escalated.
Your day reconstructed into partner-quality 0.1s. No timers, no leakage.
Clean invoices, sent and tracked automatically, with a partner review gate before anything leaves. (LEDES export, native trust accounting and three-way reconciliation are on the roadmap, not shipped.)
Polite, relentless AR follow-up with payment plans and ethics guardrails.
SEO blogs, social posts, newsletters and review responses — drafted to your attorney-advertising rules, published only on your approval.
Sub-minute lead response and a pipeline that updates itself.
ONE JOB, END TO END
Most firms bolt intake together from parts — an answering service that takes a message, a virtual assistant who follows up when they get to it, a separate tool to sign. Leads leak in the seams. Lawstaff runs the whole chain as one motion — and shows you exactly where a case would have slipped away.
A live funnel shows where every lead sits, the step they leak at, and how fast they sign.
You're a lawyer — you don't buy magic. Here's exactly where the platform stands.
Integrations connect in Settings; some are provisioned as you onboard. Everything above is live in the product today.
By design, permanently. The attorney supervises judgment, risk, and final output — that's the job.
The honest edge of the roadmap — the pieces we don't claim yet.
Built around the rules
In July 2024 the ABA issued its first ethics guidance on generative AI. It created no new rules — it applied the ones you already work under. Three of them shaped how this product is built.
A managing lawyer must set firm policy on permissible AI use, and supervise nonlawyer assistance.
This is the whole architecture. Your staff work from your written standards, and nothing they produce reaches a client, a court, or your books without your approval. Supervision isn't a setting you switch on — it's the only way the product runs.
Output must be verified before it's relied on. Fabricated citations are the well-documented failure mode.
Research runs against real opinions, and ReviewGuard checks every citation in a draft against the case-law database — flagging any that don't resolve, which is the fabricated-authority signal.
Client information must be protected, including in what gets sent and where.
Client texts carry no case substance — SMS isn't a secure channel, so check-ins say that something needs discussing, never what. Each firm's data is isolated to that firm.
Opinion 512 places these duties on the lawyer, not on a vendor — so using Lawstaff does not make a firm compliant, and we don't claim it does. We make no representation about Rule 1.1 competence or Rule 1.4 client communication about AI use; those stay yours. What we can say is that the product was designed so the duties above are easier to meet, not harder.
You handle the law. Lawstaff remembers everything else.